Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics. 2009;2:7-15
Published online before print January 23, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.108.833392
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/1/7    most recent
CIRCGENETICS.108.833392v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ioannidis, J. P.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ioannidis, J. P.A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical genetics
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Genomics
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Genetics of cardiovascular disease
Right arrowRelated Articles

Original Articles

Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes and Established Cardiovascular Risk Factors by Genome-Wide Association Markers

John P.A. Ioannidis, MD

From the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine; Biomedical Research Institute, FORTH, Ioannina, Greece; and Department of Medicine, Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Modeling, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to John P.A. Ioannidis, MD, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece. E-mail jioannid{at}cc.uoi.gr

Received November 3, 2008; accepted December 4, 2008.

Background— Genome-wide association (GWA) platforms have yielded a rapidly increasing number of new genetic markers. The ability of these markers to improve prediction of clinically important outcomes is debated.

Methods and Results— A systematic review was performed of GWA-derived markers associated with cardiovascular outcomes or other phenotypes that represent common established risk factors for cardiovascular outcomes. Sources of information included the National Human Genome Research Institute catalog of published GWA studies, and perusal of the eligible GWA articles, meta-analyses on the respective associations, and articles on the incremental predictive performance of common variants in the GWA era. A total of 95 eligible associations were retrieved from the National Human Genome Research Institute catalogue of published GWA studies as of September 2008. Of those 36 have statistical support of P<10–7. In depth evaluation of the respective articles shows 28 independent associations with such statistical support, pertaining to coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation/flutter, prolongation of QT interval, as well as type 2 diabetes, body mass index, high-density lipoprotein levels, low-density lipoprotein levels, and nicotine dependence. Between-study heterogeneity is not taken into account usually, but it seems common and it would pose a challenge to generalizability across different populations for these markers. Still limited data are available in non-white populations. Effect sizes are small and may be even smaller in subsequent replications and meta-analysis. Population attributable fractions are substantial, given the large frequency of the risk alleles. However, individualized risk measures are typically very small (proportion of variance explained <1% per marker). When used in conjunction with traditional predictors, improvement in overall prediction (eg, area under the curve) or risk reclassification is limited, and subject to methodological caveats.

Conclusions— Despite very promising signals in terms of statistical significance, evidence for improvement in cardiovascular prediction by currently available markers derived from GWA studies is sparse. Clinical use of such markers currently would be premature.

Key Words: genome-wide association studies • prediction • cardiovascular • risk factors


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Articles

Contemporary Approaches to Gene Discovery: Progress Toward Personalized Medicine?
Ingrid B. Borecki
Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2009 2: 1-2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes and Established Cardiovascular Risk Factors by Genome-Wide Association Markers
John P.A. Ioannidis
Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2009 2: 7-15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc GenetHome page
D. Corella and J. M. Ordovas
Nutrigenomics in Cardiovascular Medicine
Circ Cardiovasc Genet, December 1, 2009; 2(6): 637 - 651.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci Transl MedHome page
J. P. A. Ioannidis, E. Y. Loy, R. Poulton, and K. S. Chia
Researching Genetic Versus Nongenetic Determinants of Disease: A Comparison and Proposed Unification
Science Translational Medicine, November 18, 2009; 1(7): 7ps8 - 7ps8.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc GenetHome page
I. B. Borecki
Contemporary Approaches to Gene Discovery: Progress Toward Personalized Medicine?
Circ Cardiovasc Genet, February 1, 2009; 2(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]