Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on February 18, 2009

Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics. 2009
Published online before print February 18, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.108.806935
A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/2/116    most recent
CIRCGENETICS.108.806935v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheehy, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, K. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sheehy, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, K. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Gene expression
Right arrow Gene regulation
Right arrow Genomics
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Physiological and pathological control of gene expression
Right arrowRelated Article

Original Article

Time-Warped Comparison of Gene Expression in Adaptive and Maladaptive Cardiac Hypertrophy

Sean P. Sheehy1; Sui Huang2 and Kevin Kit Parker1,3

1 Harvard University, Cambridge, MA;
2 University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

3 E-mail: kkparker{at}seas.harvard.edu

Background—Cardiac hypertrophy is classically regarded as a compensatory response, yet the active tissue remodeling processes triggered by various types of mechanical stress can enhance or diminish the function of the heart. Despite the disparity in outcomes, there are similarities in the hypertrophic responses. We hypothesized that a generic genetic response that is not dependent upon the particular nature of the hypertrophic stimulus exists. To test our hypothesis, we compared the temporal evolution of transcriptomes measured in hearts subjected to either adaptive (exercise-induced) or maladaptive (aortic banding-induced) hypertrophy.

Methods and Results—Generic hypertrophy-associated genes were identified and distinguished from stimulus-dependent transcripts by coupling a metric of cardiac growth with a dynamic time warping algorithm to align transcriptome changes with respect to the hypertrophy response. The major differences in expression between the adaptive and maladaptive hypertrophy models were centered around genes involved in metabolism, fibrosis, and immune response. Conversely, transcripts with common expression patterns in both hypertrophy models were associated with signal transduction, cytoskeletal development and muscle contraction. Thus, despite the apparent differences in the expression response of the heart to either athletic conditioning or pressure overload, there is a set of genes that display similar expression profiles.

Conclusions—This finding lends support to the notion of a generalized cardiac growth mechanism that is activated in response to mechanical perturbation. The common and unique genetic signatures of adaptive and maladaptive hypertrophy may be useful in the diagnosis and treatment of pathological myocardial remodeling.

Key Words: hypertrophy • GEDI • heart • self-organizing map • time warp • gene expression


Related Article

Time-Warped Comparison of Gene Expression in Adaptive and Maladaptive Cardiac Hypertrophy
Sean P. Sheehy, Sui Huang, and Kevin Kit Parker
Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2009 2: 116-124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]