Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics. 2009;2:81-86
doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.108.788703
Controversies in Cardiovascular Genetics |
How should hypertrophic cardiomyopathy be classified?
Whats in a Name? Dilemmas in Nomenclature Characterizing Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
Barry J. Maron, MD
;
Christine E. Seidman, MD
;
Michael J. Ackerman, MD, PhD
;
Jeffrey A. Towbin, MD
;
Martin S. Maron, MD
;
Steve R. Ommen, MD
;
Rick A. Nishimura, MD
and
Bernard J. Gersh, ChB, MB, DPhil
From the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center (B.J.M.), Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minn; Department of Genetics (C.E.S.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics/Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Pediatric Cardiology (M.J.A., S.R.O., R.A.N., B.J.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of Pediatrics and Cardiology (J.A.T.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center (M.S.M.), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Barry J. Maron, MD, Director, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, 920 E 28th Street, Suite 620, Minneapolis, MN 55407. E-mail hcm.maron@mhif.org
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
|
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Almost 50 years of study have underscored the considerable heterogeneity
in clinical presentation, natural history, morphology, and the
genetic substrates that characterize inherited hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy.
1–5 Similarly, the nomenclature applied
to this complex cardiac disease has persistently created a measure
of confusion for both patients and physicians with regard to
the definition and perceptions of the disease. This ambiguity
has had, in turn, substantial impact on accurate diagnosis,
full understanding of disease expression, and ultimately, decisions
regarding management. At this juncture, it would seem appropriate
and timely to conceptually revisit and clarify this important
issue of names, consistent with the evolving knowledge of the
cardiomyopathies.
6
Response by Elliott and McKenna see p 81
 |
Historical Context
|
|---|
The historical confusion over the names used to describe the
entity of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy has arisen over the years
in 2 fundamental areas. The first of these concerns the nomenclature
used in prior efforts to characterize the disease. For example,
at last count there are more than 80 individual names that have
been used over the last 5 decades (most by early investigators)
to describe the disease entity, which is the subject of this
commentary (ie, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy)
7 (Figure 1). It
is likely that the confusing array of designations used to describe
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy has also undoubtedly contributed
to its relatively low visibility among the general public despite
a prevalence (ie, 1:500), which greatly exceeds that of many
other better known but less common cardiac or noncardiac diseases
8,9 (Figure 2).
Related Article
-
How should hypertrophic cardiomyopathy be classified?: Whats in a Name? Dilemmas in Nomenclature Characterizing Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
- Barry J. Maron, Christine E. Seidman, Michael J. Ackerman, Jeffrey A. Towbin, Martin S. Maron, Steve R. Ommen, Rick A. Nishimura, and Bernard J. Gersh
Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2009 2: 81-86.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Elliott and W. J. McKenna
How should hypertrophic cardiomyopathy be classified?: Molecular Diagnosis for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Not Ready for Prime Time
Circ Cardiovasc Genet,
February 1, 2009;
2(1):
87 - 89.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|